A fronte del nostro comunicato stampa che semplicemente citava una delibera di giunta, che deliberava l'aumento dei costi per la pista ciclabile Due Ponti, D'Addese e Tosi hanno risposto parlando di "accuse
ingiustificate" (che nessuno ha mosso) and "without critical technical foundation" Let's see what
:
Assessorile The duet (and one wonders why they meet in two, will be in the habit of having to pay double for all of our junta) tells us that the costs do not regarding the redesign of the stretch of road Focherini a shame that their resolution read:
* _ "* _Considerato that during the course of the discussion showed the need to perform some works different and additional to those provided in the original project, consisting basically in the design of the section of cycle path on Focherini and the creation of a new bus stop on Via Arianna November, and for which 'had to be established new unit prices;
Then it comes to redesign the stretch of road Focherini and there is no mention of work on the placement of the sewer, that it must be assumed to be separate and additional
Second, the € 350,000 compensation RFI for: in committee, we were given an explanation other than that provided today by the incredible duo, and in fact the variation of the budget for the compensation giusitifcare RFI quoted in 2009: _ "_In opinion on the draft within the executive, the company RFI compartment of Bologna, made a demand for more burden to the City concerning the positioning within its own under the railway for a total of € 350,000.00 (issue of reimbursement expenditure that will support the FRY in the interruption of rail traffic and the organization of a replacement mobility in the time period required for the positioning of the subway "
So the point is: it is critical that the undersigned without the technical foundation, or who has the basics Technical writing on the deliberations on one thing and another press release, with obvious problems of foundations "language"?
0 comments:
Post a Comment