After just 3 ½ months of waiting (at the bottom of the question on municipal energy plans to meet there Tosi had made six, and we appreciate the effort to improve) l’assessore Tosi si è degnato di venire in consiglio comunale per rispondere all’interrogazione depositata a novembre, circa la fine dell’odg votato all’unanimità dal consiglio comunale che prevedeva l’emanazione di un bando per mettere a disposizioni di privati le superfici degli edifici comunali per la costruzione di impianti fotovoltaici, un modo per poter godere di parte dei vantaggi del conto energia senza investimenti diretti da parte del comune.
La proposta era stata depositata a marzo dell’anno scorso, come nostra risposta alla bocciatura dell’emendamento sul bilancio di previsione 2010, dove chiedevamo l’investimento diretto da parte del comune per un impianto di almeno 250kwp, certain that you would pay for itself abundantly.
The amendment was rejected, but this second proposal was positively evaluated by the junta, which was approved by the Board in July, then if they have not heard from him again until yesterday.
What has happened since then? The municipality decided in December (and then, nine months after submission of the proposal and 6 after its approval), which should make them instead the solar managed (as called for in the amendment we rejected in January 2010) and still do better within the Union.
Meanwhile, without notice, is also party to an agreement with AIMAG two small works on two public schools, for a total of 39 kWp.
In summary, the city council approves a thing, the junta makes two different (of course without having to specify that they repeal the act approved unanimously by the council) with this result from the rejection of the proposal relates to the budget 2010 , dell'odg time for approval by the council, rather than to approve the agreement with the Union, it took 15 months and today we are only two schools "solarized" with an economic agreement that obviously Tosi We sell the best as possible, but that a comparison with other experiences we do not think that (and anyway, why not put it in the race, maybe a year ago there were other stakeholders as well as AIMAG, maybe they could even benefit from citizens' groups as was done in other municipalities for public facilities, in short, the usual difference between managing a "private" between the municipality and AIMAG and a real openness to city \u200b\u200beven on these initiatives).
Let's see what others have done:
The town of Lugo, that his call for "rent" the roof had done in 2009 (!), Allows for about 250kwp installations in the face of the reclamation of the roof of a School asbestos worth about € 150,000 immediately, plus a modest annual fee of about € 3000 a year for 20 years. To return to
Carpi, the POL Dorando Pietri, by the same mechanism and a plant of the same size, also won her the reclamation of its shell (in this case the work value € 250,000) plus € 25,000 cash (more or less the amount that the city will save by cutting the contract of Loria, just to give an order of magnitude) than obviously clear the electricity bill.
short, well the investment of the Union, but because they consider "substitute" of an initiative passed unanimously by the council and that he could leave at once? And while the town loses
another year playing around between different solutions (who could all be integrated), the year in addition to others already lost 5 of the energy bill, comes the criminals in the government decree, which kills the bill for renewable energy. So
between inertia and local national dementia (in fact know exactly what to do in Rome, using the pretext of the cost of incentives went to waste incinerators and refineries rather than to renewables, to kill the cradle in the renewables sector and pave the way for Nuclear), the result is that the municipality is likely to remain dry mouth, and in recent years we have laid the opportunities that were worth hundreds of thousands of euro.
Tosi in its response to the bizarre questions asked me if I believe it is incumbent upon the local government to build solar farms. Very simply say that it is for the local advantage of every opportunity given by energy conservation and renewable energy, to save and produce new resources for the community, which is clearly in this administration, largely escapes, given the modesty of the initiatives taken in terms of energy savings, indeterminate in their effects and real savings for admission of the same assessor and for evidence that the town of Carpi, to date, has used in an absolutely marginal potential of the energy bill. But
time, not their money ...
0 comments:
Post a Comment