minchionaggine the average local and national political debate (which is very clear, I also inevitably, in my small way, I am one), sometimes would be the desire, to make clear and immediately visible for all the whys and wherefores you decide to participate. Even at the level of city council, and the detractors delll'una Party, thrown at (Perhaps not publicly, even defending himself behind the anonymity) the worst insults or, at best it comes up with enough ideas furthest from the plant, from "has always been done this way" to "but that's what people want. "
And then sometimes it is good to remember and recall what you had in mind when he began 'tale is (for me, not that of the candidacy for mayor, but' tale that is part political life has a meaning, and that I drag behind by the late '80s, despite the tide of contrary evidence to that assumption).
Here 'is makes sense when the record (and holy internet) will bring to light things I had overheard the starts in that period. The ideas that made you think not only that "another world is possible", but also desirable and also feasible manner.
As in the case of Vauban, a suburb of Freiburg, you find here.
Whilst it may be that among the readers of this blog there is some of the old traveling companions of my previous political lives, everything that I tell them, before returning to take more or less elegant stone ( for charity, only verbal) in the municipal council or in the newspapers, what I would simply ask is: an experience like that of Fribourg you / we care? It 's a desirable goal? If yes, in the last 20 years of your political commitment, this is the direction you took? There have been concrete steps in this direction?
Why look, discriminating on the different model of coexistence, the new paradigms of "development" and what this development should be measured, we measure the real difference and real stake in the future. The
yes or no on issues like this (mind you, all legitimate, less legitimate is to use the words in favor of yes and actions in favor of not ...), say much more than us and our politics, not about who is the menate antiberlusconiano, who is more for the common good, for the work, who is more bla bla bla ...
Left continues to play instead of sending around the video of Kennedy, who tells us how poor nations assess on the basis of GDP, during the election campaign, during which time measuring the development of the territories that government reduces precisely all the "quantity", and then go with the car, go with the roads and highways, go with the housing developments that are eaten with the campaign and that our chances of survival for the future, because this is the "development", vai con i megamanager che ti spiegano che "sono le leggi del mercato", le quale leggi inevitabilmente prevedono che i lavoratori (di ogni tipo e razza) lo prendono in quel posto mentre qualcuno si fa le società off shore, eccetera, eccetera...
Per inciso, in via del tuto personale, ci tengo a ribadire ancora una volta che se concentro i miei strali sulla sinistra a Carpi, è perchè è quella con cui posso umanamente confrontarmi, perchè coninuo a pensare che una differenza antropologica tra destra e sinistra, DOVREBBE esistere.
Nei miei limiti inserisco la mia impossibilità e il mio sostanziale disinteresse, se non su questioni meramente istituzionali, to talk to the right.
ontologically They are unable to say that water is a common good, that the land is finite, that the public transport and sustainable development must take precedence over the private market should be operating and non-human human depending on the market, there are collective rights for ourselves and for future generations that must take precedence over the right of individuals to accumulate wealth, just as there are individual civil rights that can not be submitted to the morality of the majority.
On the left, in theory, no. Or rather, sometimes I say and not say, but the problem is always to come out of ambiguity propaganda and documents of the party, then do what you do where you have the responsibility to govern
councilmen angrily For the PD group reported that they sign to give me the "proofreader" when I do the fleas on those that are their responsibility in the management of the machine and publica in Carpi in Emilia Romagna, saying that doing so weakens the hypothesis of the un'alterntiva Berlusconi, I can only say that first we must be sure that this alternative exists in ideas, in programs in ways to manage power, and can not be reduced to a change of caste.
And this is measured, from where everyone takes its responsablità and its load of consistency between what is said during the election campaign and what you do in daily governance, giving direction and meaning to the words, a practice that Berlusconi has completely changed, but who also the system of the Left parties, which govern it, has largely contributed 
0 comments:
Post a Comment